第 1 階段,共 10 階段
新聞
經驗證的事件進入公民工作區。
公民媒體
[zh-hant] Democratic participation depends on shared facts. The Civic Media Center helps you find reliable sources, verify claims, and turn verified information into constructive civic action.
[zh-hant] When communities share verified facts, deliberation stays focused on solutions instead of confusion.
[zh-hant] False or manipulated information divides communities, erodes trust, and blocks collective problem-solving.
[zh-hant] Responsible citizens check sources, compare evidence, and prefer correction over outrage before acting.
公民流程
經查證的資訊會經由討論、分析、決策與公眾影響推進。
公民工作流程階段。使用上一頁/下一頁按鈕、方向鍵或水平捲動瀏覽更多卡片。
搜尋事件
篩選即時公開新聞、閱讀原始來源,並從已驗證的報導建立倡議。
可信新聞探索結果。使用上一頁/下一頁按鈕、方向鍵或水平捲動瀏覽更多卡片。
可信來源
選錄依循已公開的原則——而非人氣、星等或排名。
來源選錄原則。使用上一頁/下一頁按鈕、方向鍵或水平捲動瀏覽更多卡片。
可信來源
依編輯標準精選的來源。沒有排名、分數或投票。
具備編輯標準與國際分社的全球通訊社。
國際通訊社 媒體資源。使用上一頁/下一頁按鈕、方向鍵或水平捲動瀏覽更多卡片。
查核資訊
用於查核公開主張、圖像與媒體敘事的獨立組織與工具。
事實查核資源。使用上一頁/下一頁按鈕、方向鍵或水平捲動瀏覽更多卡片。
分析敘事
協助辨識操弄手法、協調敘事與資訊作戰的資源。
宣傳手法分析資源。使用上一頁/下一頁按鈕、方向鍵或水平捲動瀏覽更多卡片。
Humanity Union[zh-hant] curates sources that meet published selection principles. Listing every outlet would imply endorsement through volume rather than standards.
[zh-hant] Resources are reviewed for editorial transparency, correction policies, professional standards, and evidence-based practice. There are no popularity scores or rankings.
[zh-hant] Participants may suggest sources through civic initiatives or support channels. Suggestions are evaluated against selection principles, not vote counts.
[zh-hant] No. Humanity Union[zh-hant] recommends organizations with strong standards. Readers should still verify individual claims using fact-checking resources.
[zh-hant] Yes. After verifying a story, use Create Initiative to propose constructive civic action. Outrage is not a civic workflow — verification and deliberation are.
想找更廣泛的教育文章? 造訪知識中心.